Search
Enter at least two characters without personal information.

    LibraryArticles & FAQ Your projectRequest a quote
    LanguageEN
    Practical guides

    Publish authentic customer testimonials on a website

    A useful testimonial describes a specific experience. Its value depends on its origin, context and the ability to correct or remove it later.

    Go to the method

    Illustration of website project planning: Publish authentic customer testimonials on a website
    AI-generated illustration

    Collect an attributable experience

    After a completed project, invite the customer to describe the original need, what was delivered and what proved useful. Ask for concrete examples rather than praise. Keep the original response and receipt date in a place available to the content owner.

    Do not assemble a quotation from separate conversations or assign it to an invented person. If you shorten the wording, have the published version approved. The case-study guide distinguishes feedback, measured results and illustrations.

    • Original source and date retained.
    • Quotation faithful to the response.
    • Numerical results tied to a measurement method.

    Agree on exactly what may appear

    Show the customer the final quotation and each accompanying element: name, role, company, portrait, logo and link. Obtain permission appropriate to each one. Permission to quote a company does not automatically include permission to display its logo.

    Do not turn approval for one project presentation into unrestricted use of a person’s identity or image. Record whom to contact for a correction or removal. If someone is recognisable in a photograph, check the rights connected to that image as well.

    • Final wording approved.
    • Name, image and logo cleared separately.
    • Correction contact identified.

    Explain the evidence to readers

    Place feedback near the service it helps explain. A dated, accurately attributed sentence is more useful than a carousel of generic claims. Identify the customer’s role, type of work and any important limit on the result described.

    Do not publish an average score, review count or Review markup without the underlying reviews and eligibility for the search feature. Google’s review-snippet documentation requires marked-up information to match visible, eligible content.

    • Feedback linked to a relevant offer.
    • Date and context understandable.
    • No invented or extrapolated rating.

    Plan correction and removal

    Periodically check that the associated company, role and link remain accurate. Update names without silently changing the quotation’s meaning. If permission is withdrawn or a claim becomes misleading, remove it from pages, cards and translated versions.

    Keep an inventory of everywhere each testimonial appears. Review images, captions and structured data when making changes. The content operations guide offers a simple review cycle.

    • Every placement recorded.
    • Identities and links reviewed.
    • Removal applied in every language.

    Content updated on

    Acceptance matrix to adapt to your project

    These proposed checks use synthetic cases. Decide the required behaviour with the team, record the result and assign unresolved gaps before release.

    Scroll the table horizontally to read every column. With a keyboard, focus the table area and use the arrow keys.

    Test cases, expected outcomes and useful evidence
    CaseExpected outcomeEvidence to retain
    The removed excerpt qualified the result.The published testimonial preserves meaning without turning a qualification into a promise.Record URL, steps, result and dated evidence.

    Frequently asked questions

    Can a testimonial be shortened?

    Preserve meaning and context, identify excerpts where needed and validate intended publication. Verify attribution and permission for names, photos or logos. Do not combine separate statements into a fictional quote or invent a rating without a defined method.